Anyasulu

Anyasulu v. Tempur Sealy International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20244:24-cv-03114California3,667 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HARRIET GENEVIEVE ANYASULU, et Case No. 24-cv-03114-JSW al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OR TO v. DISMISS ACTION; SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

TEMPUR SEALY INTERNATIONAL,

INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No.

Defendants. 12 Now before the Court is the Motion to Compel Arbitration, or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss the Complaint (“Motion”) filed by Defendants Tempur Sealy International, Inc., Sealy Ecommerce, LLC, Tempur-Pedic North America, LLC, Sealy Technology LLC, and The Stearns & Foster Bedding Company (collectively, “Tempur Sealy”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it finds the Motion suitable for resolution without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion. BACKGROUND A. Allegations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.