Robb

Robb v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20245:24-cv-02885California237 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MICHAEL JAMES ROBB, Case No. 24-cv-02885-VKD Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED

MARTIN O'MALLEY, Re: Dkt. No. Defendant. a

v Plaintiff Michael James Robb filed this action on May 13, 2024. Dkt. No. 1. Pursuant to

|| the Social Security Procedural Order issued on May 14, 2024, Mr. Robb’s motion for summary 16 || judgment or remand was due within 30 days of service of defendant Martin O’Malley’s answer.

= || Dkt. No. 3. Commissioner O’Malley filed an answer and the administrative record on July 12,

18 || 2024. Dkt. No. 10. Accordingly, Mr. Robb’s motion was due no later than August 12, 2024. No || motion has been filed. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the || orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 22 ||…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.