Arrellano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FRANCISCO ARRELLANO, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00187-DMR

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

SONOMA COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 62 Defendants.

Plaintiffs Francisco Arrellano and his minor son S.A., by and through his guardian ad litem Arrellano, bring this second amended complaint (“SAC”) against Defendants Sonoma County and Deena Mistry. [Docket No. 61 (SAC).] Defendants move to dismiss. [Docket No. 62 (Mot.).] This motion is appropriate for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. Rule 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND A. Statement of Facts Plaintiffs make the following allegations in the SAC, all of which are taken as true for 20 purposes of this motion. Arrellano is S.A.’s father and shares joint legal and physical custody of him with S.A.’s mother. SAC ¶ 1. Deena Mistry was a social worker employed at the…