Petersen

Petersen v. Gold Bond Building Products, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20243:24-cv-00617California5,369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL PETERSEN, Case No. 24-cv-00617-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND

v. Re: Dkt. No. 14 GOLD BOND BUILDING PRODUCTS,

LLC,

11 Defendant. 12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Michael Petersen’s Motion for Order Remanding Action to State Court. ECF No. 14. Defendant Gold Bond Building Products filed an Opposition (ECF No. 15) and Plaintiff filed a Reply (ECF No. 18). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion.1 II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Michael Petersen filed this putative class action on December 19, 2023 in Contra Costa County Superior Court against Defendant Gold Bond Building Products, LLC (“Gold Bond”). In the complaint, Plaintiff alleges failure to pay overtime wages, meal period violations, rest period violations, failure to pay all sick time, wage statement violations, waiting time penalties, failure to reimburse necessary business expenses,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.