Zhou

Zhou v. Chai

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20243:21-cv-06067California9,059 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 YUE ZHOU, et al., Case No. 21-cv-06067-AMO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT

SIN KIONG CHAI, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 92 Defendants.

Yue Zhou, Yiwei Zeng, Tianmao Zhu, and Guohuo Zheng (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) move for summary judgment on their claims against Sin Kiong Chai and Huei Chu Chai1 (together, “Defendants”) for violations of wage and hour laws, California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq. (the “UCL”), and the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004, Cal. Lab. Code §§ 2698, et seq. (“PAGA”). They also seek summary judgment on Defendants’ affirmative defenses. Having considered the papers filed by the parties, the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART for the reasons set forth below. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual background The undisputed facts relevant to Plaintiffs’ wage and hour…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.