Zhou
Zhou v. Chai
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 YUE ZHOU, et al., Case No. 21-cv-06067-AMO
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY
v. JUDGMENT
SIN KIONG CHAI, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 92 Defendants.
Yue Zhou, Yiwei Zeng, Tianmao Zhu, and Guohuo Zheng (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) move for summary judgment on their claims against Sin Kiong Chai and Huei Chu Chai1 (together, “Defendants”) for violations of wage and hour laws, California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq. (the “UCL”), and the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004, Cal. Lab. Code §§ 2698, et seq. (“PAGA”). They also seek summary judgment on Defendants’ affirmative defenses. Having considered the papers filed by the parties, the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART for the reasons set forth below. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual background The undisputed facts relevant to Plaintiffs’ wage and hour…