Kirola

Kirola v. City & County of San Francisco, The

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20243:07-cv-03685California3,787 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IVANA KIROLA, et al., Case No. 07-cv-03685-AMO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PHASE II

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, THE, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 825, 843 11 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for permanent injunction. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). This Order assumes familiarity with the case’s record. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit decision and mandate, Kirola v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco, No. 21-15621, 2023 WL 2851368, at *3 (9th Cir. Apr. 10, 2023), cert. denied sub nom. City & Cnty. of San Francisco, California v. Kirola, 144 S. Ct. 185 (2023) (“Kirola II”), the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.