Gatlin

Gatlin v. Contra Costa County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20243:21-cv-00370California11,361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EDISON GATLIN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00370-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO

DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al., COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 131, 132

12 Now before the Court are two motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. Dkt. Nos. 131, 132. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court found this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing. The Court now GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the motions to dismiss. 17 BACKGROUND The factual and procedural background of this case are described more fully in the Court’s prior order granting in part and denying in part the motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 129 (“Prior Order”). This order does not recount the allegations in full except as necessary to resolve the pending motions. To…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.