Burgos

Burgos v. Citibank, N.A

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20243:23-cv-01907California4,096 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SUSANA BURGOS, Case No. 23-cv-01907-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL

v. ARBITRATION

CITIBANK, N.A., Re: Dkt. No. 32 Defendant.

14 In this proposed wage and hour class action, Defendant Citibank, N.A. moves to compel Plaintiff Susana Burgos’s individual claims to arbitration and seeks to strike or dismiss the putative class claims. Burgos opposes the motion, which is fully briefed and suitable for disposition without hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ papers, the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the motion for the reasons set forth below. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual background Burgos worked for Citibank from September 2010 to June 1, 2021. ECF 33 ¶ 4. In connection with her employment at Citibank, Burgos signed a number of documents. Id. ¶¶ 5-6, 7. On September 1, 2010, Burgos signed an employment offer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.