Gaxiola

Gaxiola v. Borla

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20243:23-cv-02196California1,255 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH EMMANUEL GAXIOLA, Case No. 3:23-cv-02196-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE;

v.

ORDER SETTING CASE

E. BORLA, et al., MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

Defendants. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Joseph Emmanuel Gaxiola alleges that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), and Pleasant Valley State Prison (“PVSP”) discriminated against him because of his disabilities and violated his rights to reasonable accommodations and medical treatment under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq., and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794(a)). His 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint containing these allegations is now before me for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Gaxiola has stated claims for discrimination and failure to provide reasonable accommodations and medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.