Gomez

Gomez v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20245:22-cv-05310California4,453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEXIS RENE GOMEZ,

Case No. 22-cv-05310 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT

V. GARCIA, et al.,

15 Defendants. (Docket No. 24)

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials at the Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”). The first amended complaint (“FAC”) is the operative complaint. Dkt. No. 11. The Court found the FAC stated a cognizable claim against Defendants V. Garcia, S. Pedone, and C. Whitman for the violation of Plaintiff’s due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment in connection with disciplinary proceedings. Dkt. No. 12 at 2. The matter proceeded based on Plaintiff’s allegation that his appeal challenging the rehearing was granted, which implied that the RVR had been reversed. Id.

27 1 All page references herein are to the Docket pages…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.