Abhyanker

Abhyanker v. United States Patent & Trademark Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20243:23-cv-00746California6,527 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAJ ABHYANKER, Case No. 23-cv-00746-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES PATENT & Re: Dkt. No.

TRADEMARK OFFICE,

11 Defendant.

12 This is a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) case. Defendant United States Patent & Trademark Office’s (“USPTO”) motion for summary judgment was heard before this Court on May 9, 2024. Having carefully considered the arguments advanced at the hearing, together with the parties’ papers, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS USPTO’s motion, for the following reasons. The Court additionally considers the several pending administrative motions to seal. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Raj Abhyanker is an attorney and principal of the law firm Legalforce RAPC Worldwide, P.C. He initiated a FOIA request and this lawsuit based on a FOIA request to obtain documents related to the USPTO’s ethics investigation into his legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.