Theodorakis

Theodorakis v. DFINITY Stiftung

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20243:23-cv-02280California571 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EFTYCHIOS THEODORAKIS, Case No. 23-cv-02280-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER STRIKING OPPOSITIONS TO

v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND

ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

DFINITY STIFTUNG, et al., CAUSE Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos.

12 On August 5, 2024, Plaintiff filed an administrative motion requesting permission to file an additional ten pages in his opposition to Individual Defendants Dominic Williams’s and Gian Bochsler’s motion to dismiss. ECF 88. Plaintiff argued that a “full opposition” would require 35 pages of text to respond to Defendants’ “multi-pronged attack” of the Second Amended Complaint. Id. The Court denied the administrative motion on August 6, 2024. ECF 90. Plaintiff filed his opposition to the Individual Defendants’ motion to dismiss on August 9, 2024. ECF 91. Civil Local Rule 3-4(c)(2) requires that all written text in papers presented for filing, including footnotes, be “(A) in a standard, proportionally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.