Anoke

Anoke v. Twitter, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20243:23-cv-02217California2,698 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SARAH ANOKE, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02217-SI

Petitioners,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. INTERVENE AND UNSEAL

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE

TWITTER, INC., et al., STATEMENT Respondents. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Non-party Jacob Silverman, a journalist who covers the technology industry, seeks to intervene in this action for the limited purpose of obtaining an order unsealing respondent X Holdings Corp.’s supplemental corporate disclosure statement filed in redacted form at Dkt. No. 36- 3. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for August 23, 2024. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Silverman’s motion. 19 BACKGROUND On May 5, 2023, respondents removed this action from state to federal court, asserting this Court had original jurisdiction over the underlying claims that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.