Reece

Clement Holdings, LLC v. Reece

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20244:24-cv-04024California538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CLEMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-04024-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION AND

REMANDING TO STATE COURT

WINFORD REECE, Re: ECF No. 6 Defendant.

12 The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore’s report and recommendation, ECF No. 6, to remand this case to state court. Defendant, who is not a CM/ECF participant, was served via First Class Mail to his address of record on July 26, 2024. See ECF No. 6. No objections were filed within the 14-day period, which expired on August 12, 2024. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) (setting 14-day period for objections); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d) (allowing three additional days when service is by mail). Defendant Winford Reece filed a late objection to the report and recommendation, styled as an “Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration,” on August 16, 2024. ECF No. 10. The same day, Defendant also filed a complaint asserting counterclaims1 against Plaintiff Clement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.