Weinberg
Weinberg v. Twitter, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NHU WEINBERG, et al., Case No. 23-cv-04016-AMO
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS
v. AND MOTION TO STRIKE
TWITTER, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 23 Defendants.
12 This is a putative class action involving claims of employment discrimination. Before the Court is Defendants Twitter, Inc.’s and X Corp.’s motion to dismiss the Complaint. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for June 6, 2024, was VACATED. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion to dismiss, for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background1 Plaintiffs Nhu Weinberg, Samantha Gongora, Julia Steele, Omolade Ogunsanya, Nanci Sills, Krista Bessinger, and Ikuhiro Ihara (“Plaintiffs”) are former employees…