McCloskey

McCloskey v. Humboldt County Sheriff's Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20241:23-cv-01699California1,499 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 ALLEN D. MCCLOSKEY, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01699-RMI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH

v. PREJUDICE

HUMBOLDT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 In November of 2023, the court dismissed Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint and granted Plaintiffs leave to file another amended pleading subject to a number of specific instructions that were calculated to bring the pleading in line with the standards set forth in Fed. Rule Civ. P. 8. See Order of Nov. 14, 2023 (dkt. 34) at 15. As stated by the court at that time, Plaintiffs’ complaint was due to be dismissed because the allegations were so convoluted, prolix, and difficult to understand, and because the pleading was so saturated with editorialization and conclusory assertions that bore no apparent logical relation between each other or the claims asserted. See id. at 4-15. Plaintiff then filed a substantially similar document;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.