Jessica King -v- Federal Communications Commission

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20243:24-cv-03397California441 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JESSICA KING, Case No. 3:24-cv-03397-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISMISSAL

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Pro se plaintiff Jessica King sued the Federal Communications Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, Meta Platforms, NVIDIA Corporation, Maxar Technologies, Google, Secutus Technologies, Via Path/Global Tel-Link, Inter Active Corporate, Match Group, Bumble, and Meet Group. The magistrate judge originally assigned to the case granted King leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 6, which moots her subsequent IFP request, Dkt. No. 15. The magistrate judge also reviewed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), and dismissed it as frivolous, with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 7. After that, the Clerk of the Court directed King to consent to or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 8. King declined, and the case was re-assigned to this Court. Dkt. Nos. 9, 12. King filed a document that the Court construes as an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.