Borodaenko
Borodaenko v. Twitter, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DMITRY BORODAENKO, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07226-AMO
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS
v. AND MOTION TO STRIKE
TWITTER, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 47 Defendants.
12 This is a putative class action involving claims of employment discrimination. Before the Court is Defendants Twitter, Inc.’s and X Corp.’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint and to strike portions thereof. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for June 20, 2024, was VACATED. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion to strike in part and GRANTS the motion to dismiss, for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background1 Dimitry Borodaenko is a former Engineering Manager who worked at Defendant Twitter, …