Ramachandran

Ramachandran v. City of Los Altos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20245:23-cv-02928California784 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SATISH RAMACHANDRAN, Case No. 23-cv-02928-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S PENDING

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS

CITY OF LOS ALTOS, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 110, 111, 112, 113 Defendants.

This order addresses the following motions presently before the Court: (1) Plaintiff's administrative motion requesting that the Court address “violations of the Court’s order and extrinsic frauds on court” (Dkt. 110); (2) Plaintiff's administrative motion requesting the Court to maintain the seal on its August 6, 2024 order to show cause (Dkt. 111); and (3) and (4) Plaintiff’s administrative motions “requesting the Court to investigate” (Dkts. 112, 113). These motions are suitable for determination without further briefing or a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having reviewed these motions, the Court ORDERS as follows: 1. Plaintiff filed certain materials under seal on July 30, 2024 pursuant to the Court’s 19 July 9, 2024 Further Order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.