Tevra Brands LLC v. Bayer HealthCare LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20245:19-cv-04312California1,134 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 TEVRA BRANDS LLC, Case No. 19-cv-04312-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. ADMINSTRATIVE MOTIONS

BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, et al., [Re: ECF Nos. 428, 430] Defendants.

12 Before the court are two administrative motions filed in connection with the parties’ trial briefs: 1. Bayer’s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed. ECF No. 428. 2. Tevra’s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed. ECF No. 430. The Court previously denied both motions without prejudice because the designating parties did not file declarations seeking to seal the information. Since then, both parties have filed declarations. For the reasons described below, the administrative motions at ECF Nos. 428 and 430 are GRANTED. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.