Floyd
Floyd v. Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 24-cv-01278-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
SABER FITNESS HEGENBERGER, LLC, COMPLAINT Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Michael Floyd’s Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 44. Floyd filed an opposition (ECF No. 47) and Saber filed a reply (ECF No. 48). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the August 29, 2024 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Saber’s motion.2 II. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Floyd, who is African-American, opened an all-access gym membership at Saber’s…