Ramachandran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA .

SATISH RAMACHANDRAN, Case No. 23-cv-02928-SVK Plaintiff, REDACTED v. ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CITY OF LOS ALTOS, et al., □□□ oe BY 1] Defendants.

On July 9, 2024, the Court issued a Further Order on Defendant City of Los Altos’ Motion « |! for Sanctions (Dkt. 104 — the “July 9 Order”). For the reasons fully explained in the July 9 Order, 14 || the Court held pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that “under the 15 || circumstances of this case, an appropriate sanction is to require Plaintiff to pay a penalty to the A 16 || Court in the amount of $10,000.00.” Dkt. 104 at 16. The Court acknowledged that “Plaintiff's E 17 || ability to pay a monetary sanction is a factor the Court ‘should’ consider” and noted that Plaintiff, || as the sanctioned party, “has the burden to produce evidence of inability…