Floyd

Floyd v. Santa Clara County District Attorney

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20245:23-cv-02754California276 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 23-cv-02754-BLF Plaintiff,

ORDER RE PARTIES’ STATUS

v. REPORTS; AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTS

SANTA CLARA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, et al., [Re: ECF 45, 46, 48] Defendants. a

Plaintiff Michael Devin Floyd sues the Santa Clara County District Attorney and others for

v 14 || violating his civil rights in connection with an ongoing criminal prosecution. The Court stayed the © || case pending resolution of those criminal proceedings. On August 21, 2024, the parties filed Q 16 || Status Updates (ECF 45, 46) at the Court’s request, advising that the criminal proceedings against

= || Plaintiff are ongoing. Accordingly, this case will REMAIN STAYED. Z On August 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Supplemental Status Update (ECF 48), asking this || Court to (1) remove his state criminal proceedings to federal court and (2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.