Friedman

Friedman v. City of Fairfax

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20244:24-cv-00371California12,562 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JACOB FRIEDMAN, Case No. 24-cv-00371-DMR Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 22 CITY OF FAIRFAX, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff Jacob Friedman brings this complaint against Defendants City of Fairfax (“the Town”), the Office of Building Inspector of the Town of Fairfax (“Inspector Office”), the Planning Commission of the Town of Fairfax (“Planning Commission”), Mark Lockaby, and Linda Neal (collectively “Defendants”). The court refers to the Town, Inspector Office, and Planning Commission as “Fairfax Defendants.” Plaintiff alleges that Defendants deprived Plaintiff of his right to construct his home at 79 Wood Lane in Fairfax, CA (the “Property”) by, among other things, unlawfully suspending his building permit (the “Permit”) and denying Plaintiff a right to administrative appeal of the suspension. [Docket No. 19 (First Amended Complaint, “FAC”) ¶ 1.] Defendants move to dismiss the FAC for failure to state a claim. [Docket…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.