Sepulveda

Sepulveda v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20243:23-cv-03897California547 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD SEPULVEDA, Case No. 23-cv-03897-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING STATE LAW

v. CLAIMS AND DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

ENCARNACION PEREZ, et al., FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Defendants. Docket Nos. 16, 28

13 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Richard Sepulveda’s motion for default judgment. Mr. Sepulveda seeks a default judgment on two out of four claims asserted in his operative complaint – i.e., the claims for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act. Judge Ryu issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the motion be granted. See Docket No. 28 (R&R). This Court, however, noted that the R&R did not address the matter of supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. The Court therefore issued an order to show cause (“OSC”) directing Mr. Sepulveda to show cause as to why the Court should not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.