Poslof

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LONNIE LEE POSLOF, Case No, 24-cv-05444-PCP Case No. 24-cv-05446-PCP Plaintiff, Case No. 24-cv-05447-PCP

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

LAWSUIT SHOULD NOT BE

CARLOS ARCE, et al., DISMISSED Defendants.

12 Mr. Poslof, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed three lawsuits, The Court orders Mr. Poslof to show cause by September 23, 2024, why it should not abstain from, and dismiss, these actions. In Mr. Poslof’s first lawsuit, he sought a temporary restraining order (“TRO Motion”), but did not file a complaint, See Poslof v. Arce et al., Case No. 24-cv-05444-PCP (N.D. Cal. filed Aug. 15, 2024).1 Nor did he pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP Motion”). The TRO motion is held in abeyance until Mr. Poslof files all missing documents and responds to this order to show cause. In Mr. Poslof’s second and third lawsuits, he filed a petition…