Loggins

Loggins v. Leland Stanford Junior University

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20243:24-cv-02027California7,715 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMEER HASAN LOGGINS, Case No. 24-cv-02027-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ANTI-

SLAPP MOTIONS TO STRIKE

LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 30, 57 11 Defendants.

12 Ameer Hasan Loggins (Dr. Loggins), a former lecturer at Stanford University, sues Defendants for claims arising from Stanford’s investigation into Dr. Loggins’s class sessions, suspension of Dr. Loggins pending Stanford’s investigation, and decision not to extend Dr. Loggins’s teaching contract. (Dkt. No. 7.) Before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss and anti-SLAPP motions to strike. (Dkt. Nos. 30, 57.) Having carefully considered the briefing, and with the benefit of oral argument on August 15, 2024, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motions to dismiss and strike. Dr. Loggins’s first, second, fourth, and sixth causes of action against Stanford are DISMISSED with leave to amend because Dr. Loggins…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.