Ruizpaz

Ruizpaz v. Matteson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20245:22-cv-05973California944 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARLOS RUIZPAZ, Case No. 22-cv-05973-JD

Petitioner,

ORDER LIFTING STAY; REOPENING

v. CASE; AND FOR RESPONDENT TO

SHOW CAUSE

(WARDEN) SOLANO C. S. P.,

Respondent.

12 Carlos Ruizpaz, a state prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner was convicted in Santa Clara County, which is in this district, so venue is proper here. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). The petition was stayed so petitioner could exhaust further claims. Petitioner filed an amended petition and requests that the stay be lifted. BACKGROUND A jury found petitioner guilty of first-degree murder. People v. Ruizpaz, No. H044593, 2021 WL 2619692, at *1 (Cal. Ct. App. June 25, 2021). Petitioner was sentenced to a prison term of life without the possibility of parole. Id. The California Court of Appeal affirmed the conviction. Id. The California Supreme Court denied review. Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.