Entangled Media, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ENTANGLED MEDIA, LLC, Case No. 23-cv-03264-PCP (VKD)
Plaintiff,
ORDER FOLLOWING IN CAMERA
v. REVIEW OF SECURITY
AGREEMENT
DROPBOX INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 119, 125 Defendant.
13 As directed by the Court, on August 26, 2024 plaintiff Entangled Media, LLC (“Entangled Media”) submitted a production copy of the Patent Security Agreement (“PSA”)1 and a copy of the agreement the PSA refers to as the “Security Agreement” for in camera review. See Dkt. No. 125. Having reviewed these documents, the Court makes the following observations: First, consistent with Entangled Media’s representations, the litigation funder LIT-US Chisum 22-B LLC (“Chisum”) has a security interest in the asserted patents. Chisum does not appear to have any present right, title, or interest in the asserted patents that would implicate or undermine Entangled Media’s standing to sue, nor is there a provision in the Security…