Sinatro

Sinatro v. Barilla America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20244:22-cv-03460California2,318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MATTHEW SINATRO, et al., Case No. 22-cv-03460-DMR

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

v. FILE MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

BARILLA AMERICA, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 80 Defendant.

12 Plaintiffs Matthew Sinatro and Jessica Prost filed this putative class action against Defendant Barilla America, Inc. (“Barilla”) alleging false, misleading, and deceptive marketing practices with respect to the labeling of Barilla-brand pastas. The court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification on May 28, 2024. Barilla now moves for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the order granting class certification. [Docket No. 80.] The motion is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed this action in June 2022. They allege that “[i]n an effort to increase profits and to obtain an unfair competitive advantage . . . [Barilla]…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.