Hood

Hood v. Handi-Foil Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20243:24-cv-02373California2,417 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIGETTE HOOD,

Case No. 24-cv-02373-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS HANDI-FOIL CORP., et al., 13 Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Brigette Hood brings this putative class action against three affiliated businesses, Handi-Foil Corporation, Jiffy-Foil Corporation, and Handi-Foil Aluminum Corporation (HAL) (collectively, “Defendants”). Handi-Foil and Jiffy-Foil market a variety of disposable aluminum products, including pans and containers, labeled “Made in the USA.” Hood avers that Defendants deceptively label their pans because they derive from foreign-mined bauxite, a brownish rock used in the manufacturing of aluminum pans. The operative complaint consists of five claims for relief, brought under California law, including Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), Unfair Competition (UCL), and False Advertising Law (FAL). Hood also advances claims for breach…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.