Doe
Doe v. Grewal
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 JANE DOE, Case No. 24-cv-05344-PHK Plaintiff,
v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
REGARDING FAILURE TO COMPLY
NIMARTA GREWAL, et al., WITH RULE 10 OF THE FEDERAL
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Defendants. Re: Dkt. 1 13 On August 19, 2024, Plaintiff Jane Doe filed the complaint in this matter against Defendants Nimarta Grewal and Marquita Grenot-Scheyer, alleging various harms in connection with allegedly false accusations of sexual misconduct at her place of employment. [Dkt. 1]. Plaintiff Jane Doe variously asserts causes of action against the Defendants under either 42 U.S.C. §1983, the California Constitution, or California law on tortious interference with economic advantage, id. at 13–16. According to Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: “[t]he title of the complaint must name all the parties; the title of other pleadings, after naming the first party on each side, may …