Kyle Zoellner v. Eric Losey
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KYLE CHRISTOPHER ZOELLNER, Case No. 18-cv-04471-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO
v. WITHDRAW
CITY OF ARCATA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 439 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Attorney Elizabeth Zareh’s motion to withdraw as Plaintiff’s counsel. (Dkt. No. 439.) Having carefully considered the briefing, the Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the August 29, 2024 hearing, and GRANTS Ms. Zareh’s motion because her health condition necessitates withdrawal. BACKGROUND On June 25, 2024, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the Court’s judgment in favor of Defendants. (Dkt. No. 434.) On July 15, 2024, Defendants filed the currently pending motion to enforce execution of bill of costs. (Dkt. No. 435.) The next day, Attorney Elizabeth Zareh, counsel for Plaintiff, filed a “Notice of Substitution of Attorney” in which she purported to substitute Plaintiff, Kyle Zoellner, for…