Brooks

Brooks v. Rassmusen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20245:24-cv-04279California241 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 MOLLY ELIZABETH BROOKS, Case No. 24-cv-04279-VKD Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

Vv. DISMISSAL MIRANDA RASSMUSEN, et al., Re: Dkt. No.

Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Molly Elizabeth Brooks filed this action on July 17, 2024. Dkt. No. 1. Because || Ms. Brooks submitted payment for the filing fee in an incorrect amount, the Clerk of the Court a || returned her check. Dkt. No. 2. The Clerk issued a notice instructing Ms. Brooks to pay the 17 || correct filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) no later || than August 26, 2024. Dkt. No. 3. The docket indicates that Ms. Brooks has neither paid the || correct filing fee nor filed an IFP application. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the || orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.