Lewis-Williams

Lewis-Williams v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20243:22-cv-06119California2,801 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GABRIEL CHAVEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, Consolidated Cases: v. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID No. C 22-06119 WHA TRANSIT DISTRICT,

Defendant. No. C 22-07720 WHA

BRADFORD MITCHELL, No. C 22-09193 WHA Plaintiff, v.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID

TRANSIT DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. O SER CD OE NR D D OE BN JY EI CN TG I OPL NA TIN OT IFFS' JERAMIAH COOPER, et al., PLAINTIFFS’ STIPULATED JURY Plaintiffs, INSTRUCTION v.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID

TRANSIT DISTRICT,

18 Defendant.

19 In June, plaintiffs submitted jointly stipulated-to jury instructions (Dkt. No. 95). Therein, they stipulated to the following instructions regarding the undue hardship standard: 22 Instruction No. 31 23 An undue burden is shown when a burden is substantial in the overall context of an employer’s business.

Instruction No. 32 25 If a potential accommodation would threaten the health and safety of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.