Purganan

Purganan v. FCI Lender Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20243:24-cv-06192California306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 MARY GRACE PURGANAN, Case No. 24-cv-06192-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE

v. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

FCI LENDER SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant.

13 Before the Court is plaintiff Mary Grace Purganan's "Ex Parte Application," filed today's date, "for a Temporary Restraining Order to Restrain the Trustee's Sale." Having reviewed the Complaint, the Application, and the declarations submitted in support of the Application, the Court rules as follows. Plaintiff alleges the $991,068.89 amount she is required to pay to avoid foreclosure is "overinflated due to unlawful default interest and an unlawful balloon late payment penalty." (See Compl. ¶ 33.) Plaintiff, however, who acknowledges she is in default of her loan, fails to show she has the necessary funds to pay the outstanding balance less the charges she disputes. Accordingly, a temporary restraining order to prohibit the sale…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.