Build Group, Inc v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20243:24-cv-02726California272 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BUILD GROUP, INC, Case No. 24-cv-02726-VC

Plaintiff,

ORDER STAYING CASE

v. Re: Dkt. No.

INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant.

Indian Harbor’s motion to dismiss or stay the case is granted. Indian Harbor and Build Group have an arbitration agreement that incorporates the AAA’s Commercial Arbitration Rules which delegate the question of arbitrability to the arbitrator. Build Group argues that the whole arbitration agreement should not be enforced because it is unconscionable under California law. Even if this Court wanted to, it can’t weigh in on Build Group’s arguments. Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit precedent is clear that for a court to consider such an argument, a party opposing arbitration needs to “specifically reference the delegation provision and make arguments challenging it,” even if those arguments are the exact same as those it would make against the whole arbitration agreement. Bielski v. Coinbase, Inc., 87 F.4th 1003, 1011 (9th Cir. 2023); see Rent-A-Center., West, Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63, 72 (2010). Build Group fails to reference the delegation provision or make any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.