Rossi

Rossi v. Technogym USA Corp

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20244:24-cv-02324California425 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER ROSSI, Case No. 24-cv-02324-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

TECHNOGYM USA CORP, Re: Dkt. No. 27 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Christopher Rossi seeks leave to file a second amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). ECF No. 27. Defendant Technogym USA Corp has filed a Statement of Non-Opposition. ECF No. 31. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the September 26, 2024 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b).1 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1), a party may amend its original pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days of serving it. “In all other cases, a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). The Court considers five factors in deciding a motion for leave to amend: (1) bad faith on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.