Padilla

Padilla v. Lumpkin, Director of Texas Prison System

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20244:24-cv-04022California526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ISMAEL H. PADILLA, Case No. 24-cv-04022-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING

v. RECONSIDERATION

LUMPKIN, DIRECTOR OF TEXAS Re: Dkt. No. 6 PRISON SYSTEM, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 This pro se civil case was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern 13 District of Texas. He has filed a motion objecting to the transfer, which the Court has construed 14 as a motion for reconsideration of the transfer order. 15 Where the court's ruling has not resulted in a final judgment or order, reconsideration of 16 the ruling may be sought under Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which 17 provides that any order which does not terminate the action is subject to revision at any time 18 before the entry of judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). “Reconsideration is appropriate if the 19 district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the 20 initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.