Bruzzone

Bruzzone v. McManis

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20244:18-cv-01235California552 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE, Case No. 18-cv-01235-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION AND MOTION

JAMES MCMANIS, et al., TO VACATE Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 90, 91

13 Before the court are two motions filed by plaintiff: (1) a motion seeking “relief from dismissal,” filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) and/or Rule 60(b)(3), and (2) a “motion to vacate,” filed pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1), (b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (b)(6). See Dkt. 90, 91. The matters are suitable for decision without oral argument. On October 31, 2018, this court entered judgment and terminated this case. Dkt. 59. On the same date, the court entered an order imposing pre-filing review. Dkt. 58. The court’s dismissal order set forth the history of plaintiff’s other litigation and the history of this action. See id. at 1-5. The order also “incorporate[d] the factual record and reasoning contained in Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.