Bruzzone
Bruzzone v. McManis
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE, Case No. 18-cv-01235-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION AND MOTION
JAMES MCMANIS, et al., TO VACATE Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 90, 91
13 Before the court are two motions filed by plaintiff: (1) a motion seeking “relief from dismissal,” filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) and/or Rule 60(b)(3), and (2) a “motion to vacate,” filed pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1), (b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (b)(6). See Dkt. 90, 91. The matters are suitable for decision without oral argument. On October 31, 2018, this court entered judgment and terminated this case. Dkt. 59. On the same date, the court entered an order imposing pre-filing review. Dkt. 58. The court’s dismissal order set forth the history of plaintiff’s other litigation and the history of this action. See id. at 1-5. The order also “incorporate[d] the factual record and reasoning contained in Judge…