Montes

Montes v. Capital One Financial Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20245:23-cv-04052California747 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 OMAR MONTES, Case No. 23-cv-04052-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DETERMINING CASES ARE

v. NOT RELATED

CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL [Re: ECF No. 43]

ASSOCIATION,

11 Defendant. 12 Currently pending before the Court is an Administrative Motion by defendant Capital One, National Associate (“Capital One”) to consider whether cases should be related pursuant to Civil Local Rules 3-12 and 7-11, namely Montes v. Capital One, N.A., 4:24-cv-05677-KAW (N.D. Cal. Removed Aug. 22, 2024) (“Montes II”) and Montes v. Capital One, N.A., 5:23-cv-04052-BLF (N.D. Cal. Filed Aug. 10, 2023) (“Montes I”). ECF No. 43. Under Civil Local Rule 3-12, an action is related to another where:

(1) The actions concern substantially the same parties, property, transaction, or event; and (2) It appears likely that there will be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.