Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20245:22-cv-04844California6,733 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NICKY LAATZ, Case No. 22-cv-04844-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff, REDACTED

v. ORDER RE AUGUST 19, 2024

DISCOVERY DISPUTES

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 258, 259, 261, 262, 263, 264 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Nicky Laatz and defendant Zazzle, Inc. (“Zazzle”) ask the Court to resolve numerous discovery disputes, all of which were filed on August 19, 2024. Dkt. Nos. 258, 259, 261, 262, 263, 264. The Court finds these matters suitable for decision without oral argument, although one dispute cannot be resolved without additional submissions. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The parties have delayed until the very end of the discovery period to submit six separate discovery dispute letters addressing many more than six distinct disagreements. Most of these disputes were not even mentioned at the time the Court convened a discovery status conference on July 2, 2024 to discuss all existing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.