Stine

Implicit Conversions, Inc. v. Stine

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20243:24-cv-03744California8,410 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IMPLICIT CONVERSIONS, INC., Case No. 24-cv-03744-WHO

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION

v. 9 Dkt. No. 17 JACOB STINE, et al.,

Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Implicit Conversions, Inc. (“Implicit”) seeks a preliminary injunction enjoining its former Chief Technology Officer, defendant Jacob Stine (“Stine”), and its former human resources administrator, defendant Juanita Traver Stine (“Traver Stine”), (together, the “defendants”) from (i) accessing its computer systems, or (ii) acquiring, using, or disclosing Implicit’s confidential, proprietary, and trade secret information. It also asks that I issue a mandatory injunction ordering the defendants to return all Implicit confidential information and Implicit property still in their possession to the company. The underlying complaint asserts claims for misappropriation of trade secrets, computer fraud, and breach of contract. Dkt. No. 1. The defendants do not contest that after Stine was terminated in June…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.