Canty

Canty v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20244:14-cv-05407California2,963 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD CANTY, et al., Case No. 14-cv-05407-JSW

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING REMAINDER OF

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 36 Defendants.

12 This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (n/k/a Medical Device Business Services, Inc.), DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson International (collectively “Defendants”) and required supplemental briefing. On June 5, 2024, the Court issued an Order in which it denied Defendants’ Daubert motions and denied, in part, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment because there were disputed issues of fact regarding medical causation. In light of that ruling, Plaintiffs’ claims for negligence and loss of consortium will proceed, to the extent the negligence claim is premised on a design defect. This Order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.