Ho

Ho v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20241:23-cv-03727California8,854 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 LANH H., Case No. 23-cv-03727-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 15 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) decision denying his application for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. See Admin. Rec. at 1.2 The Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration declined to review the ALJ’s decision. Id. As such, the ALJ’s decision is a “final decision” of the Commissioner of Social Security, appropriately reviewable by this court. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge (Docs. 6, 8) and both parties have moved for summary judgment (Docs. 13, 15). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.