Reaud
Reaud v. Facebook, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALFRED PEDRO REAUD, Case No. 23-cv-06329-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE DISMISSAL
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 42 FACEBOOK INC., Defendant.
12 Before the Court is Defendant Facebook, Inc.’s (“Facebook”)1 motion to dismiss. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for April 25, 2024, was vacated. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Facebook’s motion, for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background2 Plaintiff Alfred Reaud of Colorado brings this action against Meta alleging claims for sexual harassment and intentional infliction of emotional distress based on “pornographic” advertisements he saw on his Facebook page. Compl. (ECF 1) at 3, 5. Reaud received
24 1 Defendant Facebook, Inc., is now known as Meta, Inc. Mot. at 2 (ECF 42 at 4) n.1. Facebook changed its name to…