Ibarra

Ibarra v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20243:23-cv-01037California1,616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NICOLAS IBARRA, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01037-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

MARTIN O’MALLEY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 96, 97, 104 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Nicolas Ibarra, through his guardian ad litem Laura Huitrón, moves for leave to file a fourth amended complaint to add a “reprisal” cause of action. Dkt. Nos. 96, 97, 104. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for September 20, 2024. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s motion. 18 BACKGROUND On March 7, 2023, plaintiff—who is represented by counsel—filed this case challenging certain actions related to his Social Security disability benefits. On July 5, 2023, the Court granted 22 1 On August 13, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a fourth amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.