Tagle

Tagle v. Santa Clara County Office of Pretrial Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20245:24-cv-04432California324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AUSTIN DE TAGLE, Case No. 24-cv-04432-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF

PRETRIAL SERVICES,

12 Defendant.

13 On July 30, 2024, the Court issued an order screening Mr. de Tagle’s complaint, staying service of process, and giving Mr. de Tagle leave to file an amended complaint by August 19, 2024. Dkt. No. 4. The order stated that “[i]f Mr. de Tagle fails to file an amended complaint in time,” then his complaint would be subject to dismissal. Id. at 1, 5. The Court subsequently granted Mr. de Tagle’s request for an extension to August 30, 2024 to file his amended complaint. Dkt. No. 6. The August 30, 2024 deadline has passed, and the docket indicates that Mr. de Tagle has not filed an amended complaint. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.