Hester

Hester v. OMalley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20243:23-cv-04780California8,065 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 DARIANA H., Case No. 23-cv-04780-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 20 Defendant.

11 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Dariana H. moves for summary judgment to reverse the decision of Defendant Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security, denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq., and to remand this case in accordance with sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Motion at 1, ECF No. 15. Defendant cross- moves to affirm. ECF No. 20. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the matter is submitted without oral argument. Having reviewed the parties’ positions, the Administrative Record (“AR”), and relevant legal authority, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion and DENIES Defendant’s cross- motion.2 24

26 1 Partially redacted in compliance with Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.