Hester
Hester v. OMalley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 DARIANA H., Case No. 23-cv-04780-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARTIN O’MALLEY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 20 Defendant.
11 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Dariana H. moves for summary judgment to reverse the decision of Defendant Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security, denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq., and to remand this case in accordance with sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Motion at 1, ECF No. 15. Defendant cross- moves to affirm. ECF No. 20. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the matter is submitted without oral argument. Having reviewed the parties’ positions, the Administrative Record (“AR”), and relevant legal authority, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion and DENIES Defendant’s cross- motion.2 24
26 1 Partially redacted in compliance with Federal…