Hu

Hu v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20244:21-cv-05990California806 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SOPHIE HU, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05990-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

v. COUNSEL

JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et Re: Dkt. No. 45 al., 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Sophie Hu’s motion for appointment of counsel, Dkt. No. 45. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed her original complaint against Defendants in this Court in August 2021. Dkt. No. 1. She filed an amended complaint later that month. Dkt. No. 8. In December 2021, her case was transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana for inclusion in coordinated proceedings there. Dkt. No. 39. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation remanded the case back to this Court in January 2024. Dkt. No. 40. Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.